There are numerous lawsuits currently pending against Birmingham, Ala.-based Regions Financial Corp.’s Memphis-based Morgan Keegan unit. Lawsuits filed on behalf of investors allege the RMK investment funds were misrepresented as low-risk, high-yield funds, when in fact they were tied to the volatile mortgage lending industry. As a result, when that industry faltered, investors lost up to 80 percent or more of their investments, almost overnight.

Unlike some other market investors, those who invest in bond funds generally choose them because they are relatively safe investments – or they should be. The typical investor is someone who is building a fund for retirement, close to retirement, building a college fund, or an organization that has invested operating capital. These investors are looking for slow, steady growth without much risk.

According to the U.S. News report, FINRA statistics reveal that through August, the organization has received 4,991 new dispute-resolution cases to date this year, which is an increase of 65 percent over 2008. Also, 1,173 of this year’s cases involved mutual funds, compared to 935 that invoved common stocks. The three most common charges FINRA is seeing in these cases are breach of fiduciary duty, misrepresentation, and negligence.

And, investors are getting relief in the majority of arbitration settlements, according to the news report. FINRA reports that 42 percent of cases that went to arbitration in 2008 resulted in compensation for investors. However, when prearbitration settlements are taken into account, that number is even higher, with 72 percent of total cases resulting in a win for the investor.

SOURCE: Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud › FINRA statistics show uptick in bond fund lawsuits

Regions Financial Corp.

According to the report, the drop is tied to more losses in arbitration cases related to its Morgan Keegan bond fund unit, which lost $2 billion in risky asset-backed securities. Investors are suing Regions Morgan Keegan, alleging the investments were misrepresented as “safe” funds, when they were in fact tied to the volatile mortgage lending industry. When the industry went bust, investors lost up to 80 percent of their savings, practically overnight.

So far, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), which is overseeing arbitration of these claims, has sided with investors every time, awarding nearly $2 million in damages to date. Recent judgments include $285,000 to a Vietnam Veteran in Mississippi, and nearly $1 million to former NFL star Jerome Woods, Market Watch reports.

SOURCE: Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud › Regions stock drops in light of arbitration losses

The RMK litigation involves investment funds managed by a branch of Morgan Keegan & Co., which is based in Memphis. Regions Financial Corp., headquartered in Birmingham, owns Morgan Asset Management, an arm of Morgan Keegan.

According to suits filed on behalf of plaintiffs in these cases, seven RMK investment funds took a nose dive because of their ties to the subprime mortgage lending crisis, and stockholders found themselves holding greatly devalued portfolios. Because the funds had been initially represented as low-risk, when in actuality they were tied to the volatile subprime lending market, stockholders are bringing suit against Regions Morgan Keegan for their losses.

According to the Daily News story, Judge Mays considered five putative class actions that were filed in the local federal court, and two motions to consolidate. The paper reports the judge’s ruling states actions that were included in the motions for consolidation “share both factual and legal issues, arise from the same facts, raise similar legal claims and name substantially the same defendants.”

Judge Mays has not yet named a lead plaintiff in the consolidation. He ruled out one group that had petitioned for the spot as being too large, with 19 individual and institutional investors, according to the Daily Times.

There are many individual claims still pending across the country in this matter.

SOURCE: Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud › RMK lawsuits may be consolidated in Tennessee

The suit, filed in Tennessee, claims that several of Morgan Keegan’s funds were invested in collaterized debt obligations (CDOs) that were backed by subprime mortgages. The lawsuit, like many others related to subprime debt obligations, claims investors who vested in the funds were not made aware of the fund’s full exposure to the risky loans until the loans faced greater deterioration in late 2007.

The Morgan Keegan lawsuit claims, “the funds lacked adequate controls and hedges to minimize the risk of loss from mortgage delinquencies which affected a large part of their portfolios.” The plaintiffs also say “the funds’ portfolios were materially misstated due to their failure to properly value CDOs; and the extent of the funds’ risk exposure to mortgage-backed assets was misstated.”

SOURCE: Morgan Keegan Investment Fraud › Subprime Mess at Morgan Keegan